Monday, April 9, 2007

THE ART OF THE ONE-ACT


The final reading of the Spring 2007 Gwen Frostic Reading Series will take place on Wednesday, April 11 at 8:00 in the Little Theater with playwrights from the New Issues anthology The Art of the One-Act.

Arnold Johnston is chair of the Department of English at WMU and has teamed with his wife, Deborah Ann Percy, on a variety of projects, including scripts for Kalamazoo's All Ears Theatre and Whole Art Theatre and the full-length plays in the "Detroit Trilogy," which includes the award-winning "The Zamboni Situation," "Small Slam" and "Beyond Sex." Percy is principal of Maple Street Magnet Middle School for the Arts in Kalamazoo.

"Art of the One-Act: An Anthology" edited by Arnold Johnston and Deborah Ann Percy, includes 26 previously unpublished one-act plays and an introduction by the editors. "Art of the One-Act" is available through major book sellers and online from barnesandnobel.com and amazon.com.

Playwrights and their one-acts featured in the April 11 readings are Constance Alexander's "Last Call," Carey Daniels' "Hands for Toast," Bethany Gauthier's "The Nancy" and Troy Tradup's "We All Give Thanks."

"Last Call" by Constance Alexander focuses on the widow and family of a man killed during the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, avoiding easy sentimentality and looking at the lives of the survivors with a realistic and unblinking eye. Alexander is artistic director of West Kentucky Playwrights' Festival, and she has received numerous arts council and foundation grants and awards to support her writing.

"Hands for Toast" by Carey Daniels exemplifies a dynamic frequently observed in comic plays: that of the stranger in a strange land, an innocent or "normal" character who must cope with characters and customs that confound him and threaten his welfare. Daniels has a master of fine arts in playwriting from WMU.

"The Nancy" by Bethany Gauthier takes place in an upscale coffee shop, where characters Eve and Alyssa sit across a table from each other with a prominently empty chair between them. Gauthier has a master of fine arts in playwriting from WMU and has had productions with the Paw Paw Village Players and All Ears Theatre.

"We All Give Thanks" by Troy Tradup is a mordantly funny take on family Thanksgivings, featuring disruption of the holiday ritual idealized annually in popular media. Tradup is the author of eight plays, including award winners "The Desired Effect" and "Chuckling in Limbo." His anthology contribution, "We All Give Thanks," was a finalist for the 2003 Heideman Award.




Banana War

Arnie and his wife Debby team taught ENG 368 when I was a young punk undergrad. I took the class because I liked movies and Western didn't offer a screenwriting course. I didn't have any theater background, but I did love writing dialogue so I thought why not give it a go. I didn't know what I was doing half the time, but Arnie and Debby really believed in my work and helped me find my way into it all. I wrote some crap but they saw some talent in that crap. When I talked to Arnie about applying to grad schools, I was thinking about getting a Masters in Creative Writing. I wasn't sure about playwriting, because I also wrote stories and poetry. He said I should apply into a playwriting program. He believed I could do it. Sure enough, I did. I got accepted to Boston University, where I worked with Nobel Laureate Derek Walcott. Without Arnie and Debby's support along the way, I never would have pursued it and I don't think I'd be here today teaching ENG 368 and working on my PhD.

With that said, Western Michigan University's English Department Chair Arnold Johnston and his wife Deborah Ann Percy have a play called "Banana War" that you all should go see.

Here's the info:

Banana War, by Arnie Johnston and Deborah Ann Percy
Performs: April 13, 14, 20, 21
Directed by: Steven C. Smith
What happens when you vacation in a civil-war-ridden country and wake up in a jail cell? This tale of two women shows how strong, and weak, we can all be.

Night plays start at 11pm and last about an hour.

Tickets are available at the door for $5.

Complimentary coffee and donuts at every performance.

Also check out this recent article:
Kalamazoo Gazette

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Re/Vision



"The first draft is a creative process, and I'm the artist or the writer at that point. When I finish, I become an editor--it's a little schizophrenic--and the editor doesn't have nearly the fun the writer has." -- Lanford Wilson

You all did a wonderful job rewriting your 10-minute plays. Most of you were fearless in your rewrites; you all took risks and that's to be commended. Revising is the toughest (and most important) part of the writing process. Most of the hard work is revision. It can take days, weeks, months, even years to finish a play. Sound discouraging? It's not meant to be. Writing isn't for the lazy. It's work. The finished product is something to be proud of.

As a beginning writer, the toughest thing you can do is cut. How do you know what to cut? I think it's instinct. You'll feel it. You have to trust those instincts. You'll feel it in your gut. If you question a line of dialogue or a scene or a character--cut it. Trust those instincts.

Remember, this is your play. I know it's easy to get overwhelmed with feedback in workshop. I think it's good to get all sorts of feedback as a beginner. Workshops allow you a different perspective on your work. You're all new and sometimes you just don't know what is good and what is bad until it's out and people say it's good or bad. I guess this is another part of the process as well. You can take or leave any comments made in workshop. Some of it was helpful; some of it was useless. That's workshop. In the end, you have to decide on what needs to be done. This is your play. Not ours.

Congratulations on your 10-minute play revisions. You've all improved your plays and you all deserve a round of applause (or better yet, a robot named Bender with an applause sign).

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

"Partum. Attero. (Create. Destroy.)"



Check out Nathan Gregorski in:

"Partum. Attero. (Create. Destroy.)"


It's a Footlight II (which is a full-length student-directed show) directed by Ryan Welsh. It's an original work created by the director and company. It's about an earth shattering event and the reaction to it by the human race.

Where:
The York Arena Theatre at the Gilmore Theatre Complex

When:
Thursday, April 5
Friday, April 6
Saturday, April 7

All performance times are 8p.m.

How much:
FREE!

There is also a Facebook event page for it, the link is here:
http://wmich.facebook.com/event.php?eid=2257487525&ref=mf

Sunday, March 18, 2007

The What-the-F Exercise



Find a good quote from Weekly World News. I have a notebook full that I give to my students. Some of my personal faves:

"I wish I could just disappear, but the best I can do is become sort of lamely translucent."

"Thank God, I got to him before the crows swooped down and ate him."

"There was a big bang and I smelled like fish for a week."


Next, use that line/quote as the first line to a dialogue between two people. One characters says it, and the other character reacts/responds to first line.

Continue this dialogue for five-ten minutes/free write.

Now, using flashcards, write down some emotions. Examples: sad, depressed, jubilant, curious, angry, etc.

Write down some genres. Examples: Cowboy/Western, Sci-fi, Soap Opera/melodrama, , Cinemax soft-core porn, etc.

Shuffle flashcards (genres and emotions) and draw a card. Use whatever is on that card and continue your dialogue. So if you pulled a Sci-fi card, you have to create environment (possibly through dialogue of two characters) and they have to react to environment. Alien attack? What will your characters do or say in this situation? If you pulled a Sad card, your character or characters have to be sad. What makes them sad? Did they get bad news? What will happen to the dialogue? How will it change? You could have two piles: one for genre and one for emotion. You can pull card from each pile and write.

This exercise allows you to get closer to understanding your characters. How will they react in different environments? How will they behave with different emotions? Make it tough on your characters. Make it weird. Make it difficult. Really put them through hell. You'll be surprised by the break-throughs they have (and you have as a writer). Good luck.




Steve Feffer's "Lucky Punk" at the Whole Art Theatre



Check out Western Michigan University Assistant Professor (and playwriting genius) Steve Feffer's "Lucky Punk" at the Whole Art Theatre.

Here's the info:

Lucky Punk, by Steve Feffer
Performs: March 23, 24, 30, 31
Directed by: Trevor Stefanick
A small town punk rock girl wants to move to Seattle and hit it big. But as she’s about to find out, leaving home takes more than a wicked riff and a bad-ass band.


The play is part of Whole Art's Late Night Series. The show starts at 11pm. Tickets are 5 bucks. Complimentary coffee and donuts at every performance!

Friday, March 16, 2007

Extra! Extra!: In the News Exercise


I remember one time talking to my dad about writing and how I felt blocked. "I have nothing to write about," I whined. "Pick up a goddamned newspaper." My dad said.

Every day there is something new to read about. A new story. Perhaps you'll stumble across a story that really hits you. A story worth exploring. A story with people that you want to flesh out. A story you want to dramatize.

Last year, I wrote a play about James McGreevey. He put out a tell-all book about his resignation and affair. He was all over the news, Oprah, everywhere. It wasn't really his story I was interested in (though I was intrigued by it). I wanted to know his ex-wife's story. But she wasn't talking. So I thought, what if I write about her? What if I give her a voice? I'm going to tell her story.

News stories are there for the taking, people. It's made public. You can take it. I took interview quotes and public speeches and I put them into the play as dialogue.

Here's the exercise:

Read a newspaper. Browse the Internet. Browse the Blogosphere (so many wanna-be journalists out there). Find a story that captivates you. A story with a lot of unanswered questions. Those are usually the best, because it allows you to make up/create answers.

When you find a story, think about it. Think: what is the situation here? Example: James McGreevy announces resignation (as Governor of New Jersey) revealing that he is gay and that he had an adulterous affair with a man.

Next, think about a possible conflict. Example: How did McGreevey's wife find out and how did she react? Or Man (Golan Cipel) threatens to sue McGreevey for sexual harassment. What is exchange between McGreevey and Cipel?

Now how do you dramatize it all? How do you make it 'theatrical'? Well, that's the fun part.

Dramatizing news stories allows you to bring life to these stories and to these people. People who may not have a voice are now allowed the opportunity to speak.

Friday, March 9, 2007

The Greek Chorus



Paula Vogel uses a Greek Chorus in "How I Learned To Drive". Here's a definition (courtesy of Wikipedia) of what it is:

In tragic plays of ancient Greece, the chorus (choros) is believed to have grown out of the Greek dithyrambs and tragikon drama. The chorus offered background and summary information to help the audience follow the performance, commented on main themes, and showed how an ideal audience might react to the drama as it was presented. They also represent the general populace of any particular story. In many ancient Greek plays, the chorus expressed to the audience what the main characters could not say, such as their fears or secrets. The chorus usually communicated in song form, but sometimes the message was spoken.

How does it work/not work in Vogel's play? Opinions?

Tuesday, March 6, 2007

Paula Vogel and "How I Learned to Drive"




You all need to read Paula Vogel over the break. We will be discussing "How I learned to Drive" on Tuesday, March 13th.

Here are some cool interviews and articles on Ms. Vogel and her Pulitzer Prize winning play.




It's a controversial play--I'm sure you all will have something to say. And I look forward to hearing it.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/entertainment/jan-june98/play_4-16.html

http://www.thehipp.org/drive_perspectives_vogel.html


http://www.amrep.org/past/drive/drive1.html

http://72.166.46.24//archives/1998/documents/00531544.htm


http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~jmgriggs/portfoliopages/drive.html

Sunday, February 25, 2007

HERO WORSHIP





In the talkback, Gary talked about having a hero. A playwright hero/heroine. We all look up to someone. Or aspire to be like someone. Who is that person? For the most part, I've hero worshipped people like Tennessee Williams, Craig Lucas, and David Mamet. I remember reading "Sexual Perversity in Chicago" like ten times in a row. It changed the way I structured/thought out my plays. I have a habit of obsessively reading the works of one author. I did that last year with Tennessee Williams. I had to read everything he wrote--and he wrote a lot.

I'd have to say my playwriting hero is Edward Albee. He's one I always go back to. If I'm uninspired, or feeling like I don't want to write plays anymore, I go back and read "Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?" I have read that play so many times. It gets me excited about theater. It's such a simple set-up. And nothing really happens, but man, is it intense and dark and sad and funny.

I know many of you are new to reading/writing plays. But I do want you to think about this. Maybe read stuff on your own. Find your playwright. I'll start recommending writers to each of you--your style of writing will lead me to think you may dig some writer and I'll let you know. I remember being in Arnie Johnston's 368 Playwriting class and he asked me if I read any Joe Orton. I was like who? Now he's one of my favorite writers, and a big influence on my writing.

Find a writer you can relate to. Someone that speaks to you. Or someone that writes what you want to go see.

Pretend you're a six-year-old again--find yourself a hero.

Saturday, February 24, 2007

Gary Garrison Visit


What did you all think of Gary Garrison? You learn anything...if so, what? I'm curious to hear what you all have to say.

Friday, February 23, 2007

Friday, February 16, 2007

New Play Project Deadline



Who needs the beach with all it's sand and sunshine when you can spend the day in a cold, dark theater?

The deadline for the New Play Project is March 16th, 2007. I want you all to submit your 10-minute plays.

I did the New Play Project last year and I can't tell you what a great experience it is, especially since all of you are new to playwriting. It's a fantastic group of actors, writers, directors--all working together to make an excellent piece of art. It's exciting to see the final result of all your hard work performed on stage in front of a live audience. I highly recommend you all do this. It's an experience you will not forget.

If any of you have questions or want to discuss your 10-minute plays (if you wish to submit), email me and we'll talk.

Here's the specifics/guidelines you'll need to know:

New Play Project (ENGL 5970), which will be meeting M and W 9-noon, with performances during three Thursday evenings, and rehearsals on Monday evenings (times as listed in the course book).

The class includes between twelve and eighteen playwrights, twelve to fifteen actors, five directors and two stage managers. During the course students will have one of their plays rehearsed for two weeks and produced as a script-in-hand public staged reading. Additionally, playwrights will participate during the seven and a half weeks as dramaturgs, stage managers, and actors (sometimes as directors) on their fellow playwrights work, and as company members in ensemble developed plays and activities.

Admission for playwrights is on a competitive basis, and for actors and directors by permission of the Theatre Department (please contact Mark). Interested playwrights should submit two copies of a 10-30 page one-act play to the mailbox of Dr. Steve Feffer (sixth floor Sprau) with complete contact information by Monday, March 16th. You will be notified soon after that date.

Please note: We have changed the submission process slightly this year. Playwrights who are currently in ENGL 3680, have already taken 3680, but not a 5000 level playwriting class, or have not taken playwriting at Western are strongly encouraged to submit a ten minute (10 page) play. Playwrights who are currently taking 5660, have taken 5660 or a previous New Play Project, or have instructor permission, may submit a longer (up to 30 page) play
.

What is Leigh Fryling up to?


Leigh will be performing in Blue Kettle (by Caryl Churchill).

Where:
The York Arena at the Gilmore Center.

When:
Sunday, Feb. 25th at 5pm.
Monday, Feb. 26th at 6pm.

The show is free.

Leigh is also directing Little Shop of Horrors for Three Rivers Community Players. Auditions will be held on Feb. 27th and 28th at 6 pm at the Three Rivers Playhouse. A prepared Broadway song with sheet music or CD is needed. Auditionees will be requested to read from the script/and do a small dance combination. Carpooling is available.

Thursday, February 15, 2007

Adaptation Exercise



Find yourself a Shakespearean Sonnet. A sonnet you dig. A sonnet that really turns you on. Take a good look at it. Read it several times. Write down your thoughts. Why did you choose it? What was it about this sonnet? What wow-ed you?

Read it again. Now I want you to think about visuals. What visuals does this sonnet evoke? What do you see? Maybe you see this or maybe this--whatever comes to mind. Weird or lovely. Both. Go with it.

Now I want you to organize what you see. Put all the visuals in some kind of order. Think about the setting. The environment. Think about what you want on stage.

Read sonnet again. Why again? Because maybe something new will jump out at you.

Now tell me WHO do you see? Write a brief description of this person (man in top hat). Bring in one more person. Just one. Tell me about that new person. Describe he or she.

Read sonnet again. I know, right, you're beginning to get annoyed. Good. Write a scene between these two characters. A silent scene. No talking. Think about silence and how they move. Think about activity. What does one character like to do? How about the other? Move them around. But no speaking!

Read the sonnet again. You want to kill me now. Good. Use that anger. Circle five words in the sonnet that you like or that you're intrigued by or maybe you don't know what the word is and you like it. Circle it.

X out a word you hate. You hate this word. You wish it weren't in the sonnet. X it out.

Start a dialogue using one line (or favorite word) from sonnet. Now have the other character respond using the X'd out word.

Write a dialogue with these two characters. One character wants ______ from the other; the other will not give _______ to he or she.

This exercise should get things moving. If you don't like sonnets, try using a fable or a fairy tale.

Good luck, and have fun.

The Pillowman at WMU


THE PILLOWMAN
by
Martin McDonagh

February 22-24 | 8:00 p.m.
February 25 | 2:00 p.m.
March 1-3 | 8:00 p.m.
in the Multiform Theatre
General Seating

A gripping crime drama set in a totalitarian state, The Pillowman investigates a series of gruesome child murders that bear an uncanny resemblance to short stories penned by a local author. Once under interrogation, the author and the sadistic guards reveal surprising and alarming information about themselves and the crimes.

An engaging drama for mature audiences.

Mr. Edward Albee




Edward Albee is one of my favorite writers. Why? He takes chances. He's not afraid to go there. And if someone doesn't like his plays--so what? He's unapologetic.

I've seen him give a talk in Chicago a few years back. He's cocky, smart, and wickedly funny. He's also 79 and still writing great plays. Pretty impressive. I found some quotes (and advice) that I thought you may appreciate.


His thoughts on audience:

"I want them to start thinking about whether the stuff they think they believe is really what they believe. To reconsider their values. In The Goat, I want an audience to go there and not make value judgments about the lives of the characters, about what goat-fucking really means. I want them to imagine themselves being the characters in that situation. I don't want anybody to go into a play of mine and come out exactly the same person."


His thoughts on writing what you know (and a slam against Williams' The Glass Menagerie--which I'm sure some of you will appreciate):

"Don't write about yourself very much. . . . I'm one of the few people who think `The Glass Menagerie' would have been a better play without Tom. . . . The more you invent, the more freedom you have to get to the truths you're after."



His thoughts on why he writes:

"I write to find out what's going on in my head. I always have ideas for plays. They come into focus, and I write them down, and I know why I wrote them down. I usually have three or four plays swimming around in my head somewhere. I'm writing one right now, not this instant we're talking, but these days, and I have two others that are lined up, like aircraft waiting to get clearance to land, that are waiting to be written down. I don't examine the process terribly carefully, because I think it's dangerous to. As James Thurber said, let your mind alone. It knows what it's doing."

Why do we go to the theater?


1) to be entertained
2) to be informed/educated
3) to be excited/provoked
4) to feel something

Monday, February 12, 2007

The 10-Minute Play Challenge



On your mark! Get set! Go! You have ten minutes (that's ten pages) to tell a story.

How do you tell a story in such a short amount of time? By thinking small. Don't tackle anything big. I wouldn't suggest adapting War and Peace--or maybe that's a brilliant idea.

Keep it simple. You don't want a lion tamer on stage dealing with his sexuality, married to a bearded woman, who is having a very hot affair with the Human Torch. (Or maybe you do?) You don't want too much going on. An audience may be overwhelmed with all the information.

Here's some old school advice: Let's have some characters in conflict who by the end of the play resolve the conflict.

Think theatrically. Think creatively. But what is most important here: have fun.

Conflict


All plays need conflict. Without it, you have a boring play--a total snoozefest.

What is conflict? Conflict is wanting/desiring/needing something or someone and not being able to get it. Example: I want your wallet. No, you can't have my wallet.

There are two types of conflict: External and Internal.

Internal conflict happens within a character (and often affects characters around them). Think about Tom from the Glass Menagerie. He wants to leave his family, but if he does what will happen to them? Who will take care of them? Especially Laura? If he abandons his mother and troubled sister, he'll have to live with the guilt and the regret and the sad realization that he has turned into his father.

External conflict involves a character and someone or something is physically in the way to stop he or she. Think about Hester from In the Blood. Society stops Hester from getting her 'leg up'. Maybe she isn't the best example--critics will say she doesn't really try hard enough. So, think about Mae and Eddie from Fool For Love. They can never be "together" because they are brother and sister--talk about an internal/external conflict combo. Yikes.

We go to the theater to see conflict. We want to see people having a tough time. And we want to see how those people get out of their tough time. Conflict is what makes drama...drama.

Thursday, February 8, 2007

Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead at WMU


ROSENCRANTZ AND GUILDENSTERN ARE DEAD
by Tom Stoppard
February 8-10 | 8:00 p.m.
February 15-17 | 8:00 p.m.
February 18 | 2:00 p.m.
in the York Arena Theatre
General Seating
Tickets (269) 387-6222

In this spoof of Shakespeare’s Hamlet, two comedic courtiers set out to find the cause of the young prince’s madness but end up deep in their own craziness. Sir Thomas Stoppard fills the play that inspired the feature film with laughs and absurdist truths that puzzle even the sharpest of wits.

Office Hours



I don't have office hours posted on my syllabus. I will meet with anyone before or after class. I can do almost any day of the week--if before/after class doesn't work.

I know some of you may want to discuss your 10-minute plays. We can talk it out. I'd like to hear your plan for a play. Map it out for me. Tell me the story, character dilemmas, etc. I can give you my ideas/thoughts on what you should do or not do with the play.

If you're feeling stuck, I think it'd be wise to meet and discuss possible play ideas. Drop me an email and set up a time--

Friday, February 2, 2007

10-Minute Play Rules



1) 10-minute plays are 10 pages long.

2) No more than 4 characters.

3) Include an activity (such as listening to records on a victrola and looking at glass animals, lasso-ing a chair, putting on a red dress, or writing the letter A on a wall--these are a few examples of some activities we'd seen in the plays we've read so far).

4) No scene change--continuous action. By action, I do not mean explosions and car chases. Action is a character wanting something (or someone) and trying to get it. Example: I want your wallet. Action would be ways of trying to get the wallet.

5) Conflict. Conflict is something or someone getting in your way; stopping you from getting what you want. Example: You can't have the wallet. It's mine.

Thursday, February 1, 2007

Adaptation


Suzan-Lori Parks 'In the Blood' is an adaptation of Nathaniel Hawthorne's 'The Scarlet Letter'. I am sure most of you have read it--if not I'm sure you're familiar with the story. I had to read it not once, not twice, but THREE times in my academic career.

Adaptation is sort of like sampling--like that used in hip hop. You take something old and you make something new.

Last semester, I wrote an adaptation of Sherwood Anderson's 'Winesburg, Ohio'. It felt weird at first. Like I was stealing his work. I decided to familiarize myself with all things Sherwood Anderson. For months, I read his diaries, letters, bios about him, most of his short stories and novels. Adaptation wasn't stealing at all--it was more like a collaboration (between me and a dead man).

I don't like to hear writers complain about being "blocked" or having nothing to write about. There are stories everywhere. Read a newspaper. Read a history book. Or explore the works in public domain that are there for you to sample (literally). We will hopefully get around to doing an adaptation exercise (using Shakespeare Sonnets) sometime next week.

I hope you enjoy the reading.

Assigned Workshop Dates

Workshop Tues. Feb. 13th
(Distribute plays to class on Thurs. Feb.8th)
Tanisha
Joe

Workshop Thurs. Feb. 15th
(Distribute plays to class on Tues. Feb. 13th)
Andy N.
John
Scott

Workshop Tues. Feb. 20th
(Distribute plays to class on Thurs. Feb. 15th)
Erin
Andy A.
David

Workshop Thurs. Feb. 22nd
(Distribute plays to class on Tues. Feb. 20th)
Katie
Leigh
Alyse

Workshop Tues. Feb. 27th
(Distribute plays to class on Thurs. Feb. 22nd)
Evan
Nathan
Andrew

Workshop Thurs. Mar. 1st
(Distribute plays to class on Tues. Feb. 27th)
Ashlee
Ashley
Amanda

Sunday, January 28, 2007

Sam Shepard stuff


Here's another review (from Time Magazine) of the original production of 'Fool For Love':
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,950903,00.html?promoid=googlep


Check out this interesting production of 'Fool For Love':
http://www.brooklyn.cuny.edu/bc/spotlite/slpress/011802.htm

Bios:

http://www.sam-shepard.com/aboutsam.html

http://www.departments.bucknell.edu/theatre_dance/shepard/shepard.html


Article/Interview:

www.salon.com/people/bc/2001/01/02/shepard/index.html

New York Times Review of 'Fool For Love' (1983)

STAGE: 'FOOL FOR LOVE,' SAM SHEPARD WESTERN

By FRANK RICH
Published: May 27, 1983, Friday

NO one knows better than Sam Shepard that the true American West is gone forever, but there may be no writer alive more gifted at reinventing it out of pure literary air. Like so many Shepard plays, ''Fool for Love,'' at the Circle Repertory Company, is a western for our time. We watch a pair of figurative gunslingers fight to the finish - not with bullets, but with piercing words that give ballast to the weight of a nation's buried dreams.

As theater, ''Fool for Love'' could be called an indoor rodeo. The setting is a present-day motel room on the edge of the Mojave Desert, where, for 90 minutes, May (Kathy Baker) and Eddie (Ed Harris) constantly batter one another against the walls. May and Eddie have been lovers for 15 years; they may even, like the fratricidal antagonists of ''True West,'' be siblings. But May has had it: she'd now like nothing more than to ''buffalo'' Eddie by stabbing him in the middle of a passionate kiss.

Eddie is some sort of rancher, complete with saddle, rifle and lasso. Yet there's no more range - Marlboro men ride only on television - and he lives in a tin trailer. The motel room is May's most recent home. With its soiled green walls and a window facing black nothingness, it looks like a jail cell; its doors slam shut with a fierce metallic clang. When Eddie uses his rope, all he can snare is a bedpost. When the two lovers want to escape, they don't mount horses for a fast getaway - they merely run to the parking lot and back.

But if the West is now reduced to this - a blank empty room with an unmade bed - Mr. Shepard fills that space with reveries as big as all outdoors. When the play's fighting lets up, we hear monologues resembling crackling campfire tales. The characters - who also include May's new suitor (Dennis Ludlow) and a ghostly ''old man'' (Will Marchetti) sipping Jim Beam in a rocking chair - try to find who they are and where they are. Though the West has become but a figment of the movies, Eddie contends that ''there's not a movie in this town that can match the story I can tell.''

Laced with the floating images of cattle herds, old cars and even a spectral Spencer Tracy looming in the dark, these hallucinatory stories chart the Shepard vision. His characters are ''disconnected''; they fear being ''erased''; they hope to be ''completely whole.'' In ''Fool for Love,'' each story gives us a different ''version'' of who May, Eddie and the old man are, and the stories rarely mesh in terms of facts. Yet they do cohere as an expression of the author's consciousness: as Shepard's people race verbally through the debris of the West, they search for the identities and familial roots that have disappared with the landscape of legend.

Not finding what they seek, they use their dreams as weapons, to wipe each other out. The old man, a ghostly figure who may be May and Eddie's father, tells the couple that they could be ''anybody's children'' - ''I don't recognize myself in either of you and never did.'' Eddie and May respond in kind, even as they obliterate their own shared past. ''You got me confused with someone else,'' says May to her lover, vowing never again to be suckered into one of his ''little fantasies.'' What remains of Eddie's fantastical West is ultimately destroyed, too: his few horses burn in the play's apocalyptic finale.

Mr. Shepard's conceits are arresting and funny. Eddie, in explaining his particular erotic fixation, tells May that her neck keeps ''coming up for some reason.'' The old man contends he is married to Barbara Mandrell and announces, without much fear of contradiction, that the singer's picture is hanging on an empty wall. There is a strange poignancy to May's suitor, a gentle maintenance man too lost even to dream of a self. Like a much talked-about ''countess'' of Eddie's supposed acquaintance, this sweet gentleman caller, intentionally or not, provides ''Fool for Love'' with an odd, unlikely echo of Tennessee Williams.

The production at the Circle Rep allows New York audiences to see the play in its native staging. ''Fool for Love'' has been transported here from Mr. Shepard's home base, the Magic Theater of San Francisco, complete with the original cast under the author's direction. The actors are all excellent: With utter directness, they create their own elusive yet robust world - feisty, muscular, sexually charged - and we either enter it or not.

''Fool for Love'' isn't the fullest Shepard creation one ever hopes to encounter, but, at this point in this writer's prolific 20-year career, he almost demands we see his plays as a continuum: they bleed together. In the mode of his recent work, this play has a title and beat that's more redolent of country music than rock; the theatrical terms are somewhat more realistic than outright mythic (though reality is always in the eye of the beholder). The knockabout physical humor sometimes becomes excessive both in the writing and the playing; there are also, as usual, some duller riffs that invite us to drift away.

It could be argued, perhaps, that both the glory and failing of Mr. Shepard's art is its extraordinary afterlife: His works often play more feverishly in the mind after they're over than they do while they're before us in the theater. But that's the way he is, and who would or could change him? Like the visionary pioneers who once ruled the open geography of the West, Mr. Shepard rules his vast imaginative frontier by making his own, ironclad laws. Buffaloing Eddie FOOL FOR LOVE, written and directed by Sam Shepard; sets by Andy Stacklin; costumes by Ardyss L. Golden; lighting designed by Kurt Landisman; sound by J.A. Deane; associate director, Julie Hebert; production stage manager, Suzanne Fry; lighting supervised by Mal Sturchio. The Magic Theater of San Francisco's Production presented by Circle Repertory Compa- ny, Marshall W. Mason, artistic director; Richard Frankel, managing director; B. Rodney Marriott, acting artistic director. At 99 Seventh Avenue South. May .......................................Kathy Baker Eddie .......................................Ed Harris Martin ..................................Dennis Ludlow The Old Man ............................Will Marchetti

Saturday, January 27, 2007

Discussion boards are boring

I looked at so many discussion boards today, and I wasn't happy with what I found. They're rather dull. I decided to go with a blog instead. Again, I don't expect you all to maintain a blog for this class--but I encourage you to leave comments on this blog. If you do decide to create a blog devoted to this class/playwriting, let me know and I can add you to the Playwriting blog roll.

I'll post stuff on here once or twice a week. I'll have links to interviews, articles, bios, and other goodies on the plays and playwrights we are reading in class.

I do expect proper 'netiquette' in the classroom blog. Respect me and your peers. Do not post anything grossly inappropriate or rude. Do not post anything mean or hateful.

Happy blogging!